Radiometric dating a christian perspective german russing dating

25-Aug-2016 07:51

We cannot go back into the past to measure all the parameters we need in order to do the dating calculation.Hence, all these parameters must be assumed—always.By the mid- to late 1800s, geologists, physicists, and chemists were searching for ways to quantify the age of the Earth.Lord Kelvin and Clarence King calculated the length of time required for the Earth to cool from a white-hot liquid state; they eventually settled on 24 million years.Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.One is the Carbon-14 system used for dating fragments of once-living organisms.This is best illustrated by the radioactive age of a sample of diamonds from Zaire.

That’s just over half a percent error in something that is supposedly multiple billions of years old.“The widespread emanation of C-free volcanogenic carbon dioxide after the Flood would have further inflated the carbon-14 dates of tree rings in a systematic manner in many parts of the world.”[vii] Naturalists have to assume whether wood remains were near volcanic vents or not."How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?Of course, that error estimate is complete nonsense.It refers to one specific source of error – the uncertainty in the measurement of the amounts of various atoms used in the analysis.

That’s just over half a percent error in something that is supposedly multiple billions of years old.

“The widespread emanation of C-free volcanogenic carbon dioxide after the Flood would have further inflated the carbon-14 dates of tree rings in a systematic manner in many parts of the world.”[vii] Naturalists have to assume whether wood remains were near volcanic vents or not.

"How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?

Of course, that error estimate is complete nonsense.

It refers to one specific source of error – the uncertainty in the measurement of the amounts of various atoms used in the analysis.

" This article addresses that question, which represents the thinking of a large number of people today.